India vs Pakistan: Citizen support for democracy

India
-1.79
in 2020
Pakistan
-1.81
in 2020
India rank
142nd
Pakistan rank
143rd

Citizen support for democracy over time

  • India
  • Pakistan
-2-1.5-1-0.5199520072020

How they compare

India currently reports -1.79 against -1.81 in Pakistan, a difference of 0.02.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 24 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Pakistan ahead.

India ranks 142nd and Pakistan ranks 143rd of 144 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, India averaged higher in 3 and Pakistan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Pakistan Difference Ahead
1990s -1.02 -0.6334 0.3869 Pakistan
2000s -1.03 -1.2 0.1761 India
2010s -1.48 -1.65 0.1753 India
2020s -1.79 -1.81 0.0226 India

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher citizen support for democracy, India or Pakistan?
India, at -1.79 against -1.81 in Pakistan as of 2020.
What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between India and Pakistan?
0.02, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Pakistan?
24 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2020.
How do India and Pakistan rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
India ranks 142nd and Pakistan ranks 143rd of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Citizen support for democracy
Source
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,104 data points, 1988–2020
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.