India vs Mozambique: Citizen support for democracy

India
-1.79
in 2020
Mozambique
-1.71
in 2020
India rank
142nd
Mozambique rank
139th

Citizen support for democracy over time

  • India
  • Mozambique
-2-1.8-1.5-1.2-1199520072020

How they compare

Mozambique currently reports -1.71 against -1.79 in India, a difference of 0.08.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 2002 it was India ahead.

India ranks 142nd and Mozambique ranks 139th of 144 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, India averaged higher in 2 and Mozambique in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Mozambique Difference Ahead
2000s -1.04 -1.51 0.4665 India
2010s -1.48 -1.61 0.1337 India
2020s -1.79 -1.71 0.0751 Mozambique

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher citizen support for democracy, India or Mozambique?
Mozambique, at -1.71 against -1.79 in India as of 2020.
What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between India and Mozambique?
0.08, with Mozambique ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Mozambique?
19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2020.
How do India and Mozambique rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
India ranks 142nd and Mozambique ranks 139th of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Citizen support for democracy
Source
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,104 data points, 1988–2020
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.