Honduras vs Mozambique: Citizen support for democracy

Honduras
-1.64
in 2020
Mozambique
-1.71
in 2020
Honduras rank
137th
Mozambique rank
139th

Citizen support for democracy over time

  • Honduras
  • Mozambique
-2-1.5-1-0.50199620082020

How they compare

Honduras currently reports -1.64 against -1.71 in Mozambique, a difference of 0.07.

Across all 19 years both countries report, Honduras has been ahead every year.

Honduras ranks 137th and Mozambique ranks 139th of 144 countries.

Honduras has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Honduras Mozambique Difference Ahead
2000s -0.6226 -1.51 0.8879 Honduras
2010s -0.9187 -1.61 0.6926 Honduras
2020s -1.64 -1.71 0.0719 Honduras

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Honduras or Mozambique?
Honduras, at -1.64 against -1.71 in Mozambique as of 2020.
What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Honduras and Mozambique?
0.07, with Honduras ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Mozambique?
19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2020.
How do Honduras and Mozambique rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
Honduras ranks 137th and Mozambique ranks 139th of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Citizen support for democracy
Source
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,104 data points, 1988–2020
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.