Guinea vs Slovakia: Citizen support for democracy

Guinea
0.0267
in 2020
Slovakia
-0.0113
in 2020
Guinea rank
59th
Slovakia rank
61st

Citizen support for democracy over time

  • Guinea
  • Slovakia
00.20.40.60.8199020052020

How they compare

Guinea currently reports 0.0267 against -0.0113 in Slovakia, a difference of 0.038.

That makes Guinea's figure about 2.4 times Slovakia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Slovakia ahead.

Guinea ranks 59th and Slovakia ranks 61st of 144 countries.

Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea Slovakia Difference Ahead
2010s 0.0037 -0.021 0.0247 Guinea
2020s 0.0267 -0.0113 0.0379 Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Guinea or Slovakia?
Guinea, at 0.0267 against -0.0113 in Slovakia as of 2020.
What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Guinea and Slovakia?
0.038, with Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Slovakia?
8 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2020.
How do Guinea and Slovakia rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
Guinea ranks 59th and Slovakia ranks 61st of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Citizen support for democracy
Source
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,104 data points, 1988–2020
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.