Guatemala vs Iran: Citizen support for democracy

Guatemala
-1.18
in 2020
Iran
-1.12
in 2020
Guatemala rank
124th
Iran rank
121st

Citizen support for democracy over time

  • Guatemala
  • Iran
-2.5-2-1.5-1-0.50199620082020

How they compare

Iran currently reports -1.12 against -1.18 in Guatemala, a difference of 0.06.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 21 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 124th and Iran ranks 121st of 144 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and Iran in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Iran Difference Ahead
2000s -0.8671 -1.56 0.6951 Guatemala
2010s -0.8456 -1.15 0.302 Guatemala
2020s -1.18 -1.12 0.0535 Iran

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Guatemala or Iran?
Iran, at -1.12 against -1.18 in Guatemala as of 2020.
What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Guatemala and Iran?
0.06, with Iran ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Iran?
21 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2020.
How do Guatemala and Iran rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
Guatemala ranks 124th and Iran ranks 121st of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Citizen support for democracy
Source
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,104 data points, 1988–2020
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.