Ghana vs Tanzania: Citizen support for democracy

Ghana
0.234
in 2020
Tanzania
0.2797
in 2020
Ghana rank
43rd
Tanzania rank
42nd

Citizen support for democracy over time

  • Ghana
  • Tanzania
-0.500.51199920092020

How they compare

Tanzania currently reports 0.2797 against 0.234 in Ghana, a difference of 0.0457.

That makes Tanzania's figure about 1.2 times Ghana's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Tanzania ahead.

Ghana ranks 43rd and Tanzania ranks 42nd of 144 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ghana Tanzania Difference Ahead
2000s 0.3413 0.0648 0.2765 Ghana
2010s 0.4755 0.333 0.1425 Ghana
2020s 0.234 0.2797 0.0456 Tanzania

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Ghana or Tanzania?
Tanzania, at 0.2797 against 0.234 in Ghana as of 2020.
What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Ghana and Tanzania?
0.0457, with Tanzania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Tanzania?
20 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2020.
How do Ghana and Tanzania rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
Ghana ranks 43rd and Tanzania ranks 42nd of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Citizen support for democracy
Source
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,104 data points, 1988–2020
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.