Gabon vs Slovenia: Citizen support for democracy

Gabon
0.4402
in 2020
Slovenia
0.4731
in 2020
Gabon rank
34th
Slovenia rank
31st

Citizen support for democracy over time

  • Gabon
  • Slovenia
-1-0.500.5199120052020

How they compare

Slovenia currently reports 0.4731 against 0.4402 in Gabon, a difference of 0.0329.

That makes Slovenia's figure about 1.1 times Gabon's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 6 shared years of data; in 2015 it was Gabon ahead.

Gabon ranks 34th and Slovenia ranks 31st of 144 countries.

Slovenia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gabon Slovenia Difference Ahead
2010s 0.4346 0.4391 0.0045 Slovenia
2020s 0.4402 0.4731 0.0329 Slovenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Gabon or Slovenia?
Slovenia, at 0.4731 against 0.4402 in Gabon as of 2020.
What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Gabon and Slovenia?
0.0329, with Slovenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Slovenia?
6 years are reported by both, from 2015 to 2020.
How do Gabon and Slovenia rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
Gabon ranks 34th and Slovenia ranks 31st of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Citizen support for democracy
Source
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,104 data points, 1988–2020
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.