France vs Israel: Citizen support for democracy

France
0.8361
in 2020
Israel
0.7144
in 2020
France rank
22nd
Israel rank
25th

Citizen support for democracy over time

  • France
  • Israel
00.250.50.751198820042020

How they compare

France currently reports 0.8361 against 0.7144 in Israel, a difference of 0.1217.

That makes France's figure about 1.2 times Israel's.

Across all 18 years both countries report, France has been ahead every year.

France ranks 22nd and Israel ranks 25th of 144 countries.

France has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade France Israel Difference Ahead
2000s 0.9201 0.7226 0.1976 France
2010s 0.8452 0.7187 0.1266 France
2020s 0.8361 0.7144 0.1217 France

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher citizen support for democracy, France or Israel?
France, at 0.8361 against 0.7144 in Israel as of 2020.
What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between France and Israel?
0.1217, with France ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for France and Israel?
18 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2020.
How do France and Israel rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
France ranks 22nd and Israel ranks 25th of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Citizen support for democracy
Source
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,104 data points, 1988–2020
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.