France vs Hungary: Citizen support for democracy

France
0.8361
in 2020
Hungary
0.851
in 2020
France rank
22nd
Hungary rank
20th

Citizen support for democracy over time

  • France
  • Hungary
00.250.50.751198820042020

How they compare

Hungary currently reports 0.851 against 0.8361 in France, a difference of 0.0149.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 31 shared years of data; in 1990 it was France ahead.

France ranks 22nd and Hungary ranks 20th of 144 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, France averaged higher in 3 and Hungary in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade France Hungary Difference Ahead
1990s 0.6043 0.3694 0.2349 France
2000s 0.8444 0.1699 0.6745 France
2010s 0.8452 0.6311 0.2141 France
2020s 0.8361 0.851 0.015 Hungary

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher citizen support for democracy, France or Hungary?
Hungary, at 0.851 against 0.8361 in France as of 2020.
What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between France and Hungary?
0.0149, with Hungary ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for France and Hungary?
31 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2020.
How do France and Hungary rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
France ranks 22nd and Hungary ranks 20th of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Citizen support for democracy
Source
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,104 data points, 1988–2020
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.