Finland vs Germany: Citizen support for democracy

Finland
1.6
in 2020
Germany
1.86
in 2020
Finland rank
11th
Germany rank
9th

Citizen support for democracy over time

  • Finland
  • Germany
0.511.52198820042020

How they compare

Germany currently reports 1.86 against 1.6 in Finland, a difference of 0.26.

That makes Germany's figure about 1.2 times Finland's.

Across all 25 years both countries report, Germany has been ahead every year.

Finland ranks 11th and Germany ranks 9th of 144 countries.

Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Germany Difference Ahead
1990s 0.5314 1.78 1.25 Germany
2000s 0.97 1.48 0.5101 Germany
2010s 1.42 1.63 0.2154 Germany
2020s 1.6 1.86 0.2612 Germany

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Finland or Germany?
Germany, at 1.86 against 1.6 in Finland as of 2020.
What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Finland and Germany?
0.26, with Germany ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Germany?
25 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2020.
How do Finland and Germany rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
Finland ranks 11th and Germany ranks 9th of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Citizen support for democracy
Source
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,104 data points, 1988–2020
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.