Ecuador vs Saudi Arabia: Citizen support for democracy

Ecuador
-1.43
in 2020
Saudi Arabia
-1.43
in 2020
Ecuador rank
133rd
Saudi Arabia rank
134th

Citizen support for democracy over time

  • Ecuador
  • Saudi Arabia
-1.5-1-0.50199620082020

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports -1.43 against -1.43 in Saudi Arabia, a difference of 0.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Ecuador has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 133rd and Saudi Arabia ranks 134th of 144 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Saudi Arabia Difference Ahead
2000s -0.7532 -1.28 0.5236 Ecuador
2010s -0.3235 -1.43 1.1 Ecuador
2020s -1.43 -1.43 0.0009 Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Ecuador or Saudi Arabia?
Ecuador, at -1.43 against -1.43 in Saudi Arabia as of 2020.
What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Ecuador and Saudi Arabia?
0, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Saudi Arabia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2020.
How do Ecuador and Saudi Arabia rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
Ecuador ranks 133rd and Saudi Arabia ranks 134th of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Citizen support for democracy
Source
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,104 data points, 1988–2020
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.