Croatia vs Malawi: Citizen support for democracy

Croatia
0.1249
in 2020
Malawi
0.128
in 2020
Croatia rank
53rd
Malawi rank
51st

Citizen support for democracy over time

  • Croatia
  • Malawi
-1-0.500.511.5199320062020

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 0.128 against 0.1249 in Croatia, a difference of 0.0031.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Croatia ahead.

Croatia ranks 53rd and Malawi ranks 51st of 144 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Malawi Difference Ahead
1990s 1.19 0.1167 1.08 Croatia
2000s 0.3858 -0.3403 0.7262 Croatia
2010s 0.0967 0.1713 0.0745 Malawi
2020s 0.1249 0.128 0.0031 Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Croatia or Malawi?
Malawi, at 0.128 against 0.1249 in Croatia as of 2020.
What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Croatia and Malawi?
0.0031, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Malawi?
22 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2020.
How do Croatia and Malawi rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
Croatia ranks 53rd and Malawi ranks 51st of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Citizen support for democracy
Source
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,104 data points, 1988–2020
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.