Cote d'Ivoire vs Sri Lanka: Citizen support for democracy
Citizen support for democracy over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 0.6014 against 0.4725 in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.1289.
That makes Sri Lanka's figure about 1.3 times Cote d'Ivoire's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2013 it was Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 32nd and Sri Lanka ranks 29th of 144 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 1 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cote d'Ivoire | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 0.6793 | 0.6097 | 0.0697 | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 2020s | 0.4725 | 0.6014 | 0.1289 | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Cote d'Ivoire or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 0.6014 against 0.4725 in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2020.
- What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Cote d'Ivoire and Sri Lanka?
- 0.1289, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Sri Lanka?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2013 to 2020.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and Sri Lanka rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 32nd and Sri Lanka ranks 29th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Claassen (2022) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.