Colombia vs Nepal: Citizen support for democracy

Colombia
-0.923
in 2020
Nepal
-0.9406
in 2020
Colombia rank
108th
Nepal rank
110th

Citizen support for democracy over time

  • Colombia
  • Nepal
-1.2-1-0.75-0.5-0.25199620082020

How they compare

Colombia currently reports -0.923 against -0.9406 in Nepal, a difference of 0.0176.

Across all 16 years both countries report, Colombia has been ahead every year.

Colombia ranks 108th and Nepal ranks 110th of 144 countries.

Colombia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Nepal Difference Ahead
2000s -0.3313 -1.25 0.9209 Colombia
2010s -0.4182 -0.9739 0.5557 Colombia
2020s -0.923 -0.9406 0.0177 Colombia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Colombia or Nepal?
Colombia, at -0.923 against -0.9406 in Nepal as of 2020.
What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Colombia and Nepal?
0.0176, with Colombia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Nepal?
16 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2020.
How do Colombia and Nepal rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
Colombia ranks 108th and Nepal ranks 110th of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Citizen support for democracy
Source
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,104 data points, 1988–2020
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.