China vs Ghana: Citizen support for democracy

China
0.3027
in 2020
Ghana
0.234
in 2020
China rank
40th
Ghana rank
43rd

Citizen support for democracy over time

  • China
  • Ghana
-1-0.500.51199920092020

How they compare

China currently reports 0.3027 against 0.234 in Ghana, a difference of 0.0687.

That makes China's figure about 1.3 times Ghana's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Ghana ahead.

China ranks 40th and Ghana ranks 43rd of 144 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Ghana in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Ghana Difference Ahead
2000s -0.7149 0.3413 1.06 Ghana
2010s -0.196 0.4755 0.6715 Ghana
2020s 0.3027 0.234 0.0686 China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher citizen support for democracy, China or Ghana?
China, at 0.3027 against 0.234 in Ghana as of 2020.
What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between China and Ghana?
0.0687, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Ghana?
20 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2020.
How do China and Ghana rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
China ranks 40th and Ghana ranks 43rd of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Citizen support for democracy
Source
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,104 data points, 1988–2020
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.