Chile vs Lebanon: Citizen support for democracy

Chile
-0.1956
in 2020
Lebanon
-0.1699
in 2020
Chile rank
70th
Lebanon rank
67th

Citizen support for democracy over time

  • Chile
  • Lebanon
-0.6-0.4-0.2-00.20.4199520072020

How they compare

Lebanon currently reports -0.1699 against -0.1956 in Chile, a difference of 0.0257.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Lebanon ahead.

Chile ranks 70th and Lebanon ranks 67th of 144 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Lebanon in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Lebanon Difference Ahead
2000s -0.2254 0.1729 0.3983 Lebanon
2010s 0.0397 0.0335 0.0063 Chile
2020s -0.1956 -0.1699 0.0257 Lebanon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Chile or Lebanon?
Lebanon, at -0.1699 against -0.1956 in Chile as of 2020.
What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Chile and Lebanon?
0.0257, with Lebanon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Lebanon?
19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2020.
How do Chile and Lebanon rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
Chile ranks 70th and Lebanon ranks 67th of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Citizen support for democracy
Source
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,104 data points, 1988–2020
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.