Cape Verde vs Singapore: Citizen support for democracy

Cape Verde
0.0888
in 2020
Singapore
0.127
in 2020
Cape Verde rank
55th
Singapore rank
52nd

Citizen support for democracy over time

  • Cape Verde
  • Singapore
-0.4-0.200.20.40.6200220112020

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 0.127 against 0.0888 in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.0382.

That makes Singapore's figure about 1.4 times Cape Verde's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Singapore ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 55th and Singapore ranks 52nd of 144 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cape Verde Singapore Difference Ahead
2000s -0.2293 0.432 0.6612 Singapore
2010s 0.2684 -0.1348 0.4032 Cape Verde
2020s 0.0888 0.127 0.0382 Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Cape Verde or Singapore?
Singapore, at 0.127 against 0.0888 in Cape Verde as of 2020.
What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Cape Verde and Singapore?
0.0382, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Singapore?
19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2020.
How do Cape Verde and Singapore rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
Cape Verde ranks 55th and Singapore ranks 52nd of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Citizen support for democracy
Source
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,104 data points, 1988–2020
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.