Burkina Faso vs Palestine, State of: Citizen support for democracy
Citizen support for democracy over time
- Burkina Faso
- Palestine, State of
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports -0.7201 against -0.755 in Palestine, State of, a difference of 0.0349.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Palestine, State of ahead.
Burkina Faso ranks 93rd and Palestine, State of ranks 96th of 144 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Burkina Faso averaged higher in 2 and Palestine, State of in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Palestine, State of | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -1.07 | -0.3991 | 0.6739 | Palestine, State of |
| 2010s | -0.539 | -0.6718 | 0.1329 | Burkina Faso |
| 2020s | -0.7201 | -0.755 | 0.0349 | Burkina Faso |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Burkina Faso or Palestine, State of?
- Burkina Faso, at -0.7201 against -0.755 in Palestine, State of as of 2020.
- What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Burkina Faso and Palestine, State of?
- 0.0349, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Palestine, State of?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Burkina Faso and Palestine, State of rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
- Burkina Faso ranks 93rd and Palestine, State of ranks 96th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Claassen (2022) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.