Bulgaria vs Latvia: Citizen support for democracy

Bulgaria
-0.4845
in 2020
Latvia
-0.4722
in 2020
Bulgaria rank
81st
Latvia rank
79th

Citizen support for democracy over time

  • Bulgaria
  • Latvia
-1.5-1-0.50199020052020

How they compare

Latvia currently reports -0.4722 against -0.4845 in Bulgaria, a difference of 0.0123.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.

Bulgaria ranks 81st and Latvia ranks 79th of 144 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bulgaria Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s -0.8227 -0.3382 0.4844 Latvia
2000s -0.9615 -0.3132 0.6483 Latvia
2010s -0.5917 -0.4845 0.1073 Latvia
2020s -0.4845 -0.4722 0.0123 Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Bulgaria or Latvia?
Latvia, at -0.4722 against -0.4845 in Bulgaria as of 2020.
What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Bulgaria and Latvia?
0.0123, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bulgaria and Latvia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Bulgaria and Latvia rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
Bulgaria ranks 81st and Latvia ranks 79th of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Citizen support for democracy
Source
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,104 data points, 1988–2020
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.