Brazil vs North Macedonia: Citizen support for democracy
Citizen support for democracy over time
- Brazil
- North Macedonia
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports -0.8789 against -0.8999 in Brazil, a difference of 0.021.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 106th and North Macedonia ranks 104th of 144 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 3 and North Macedonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | North Macedonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.6209 | -0.846 | 0.2251 | Brazil |
| 2000s | -0.6825 | -0.7894 | 0.1068 | Brazil |
| 2010s | -0.6453 | -0.7955 | 0.1503 | Brazil |
| 2020s | -0.8999 | -0.8789 | 0.0209 | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Brazil or North Macedonia?
- North Macedonia, at -0.8789 against -0.8999 in Brazil as of 2020.
- What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Brazil and North Macedonia?
- 0.021, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and North Macedonia?
- 23 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2020.
- How do Brazil and North Macedonia rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
- Brazil ranks 106th and North Macedonia ranks 104th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Claassen (2022) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.