Brazil vs Jordan: Citizen support for democracy

Brazil
-0.8999
in 2020
Jordan
-0.9346
in 2020
Brazil rank
106th
Jordan rank
109th

Citizen support for democracy over time

  • Brazil
  • Jordan
-1.2-1-0.75-0.5-0.25199520072020

How they compare

Brazil currently reports -0.8999 against -0.9346 in Jordan, a difference of 0.0347.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 106th and Jordan ranks 109th of 144 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Jordan Difference Ahead
2000s -0.6634 -0.9447 0.2812 Brazil
2010s -0.6453 -0.7684 0.1232 Brazil
2020s -0.8999 -0.9346 0.0347 Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Brazil or Jordan?
Brazil, at -0.8999 against -0.9346 in Jordan as of 2020.
What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Brazil and Jordan?
0.0347, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Jordan?
20 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2020.
How do Brazil and Jordan rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
Brazil ranks 106th and Jordan ranks 109th of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Citizen support for democracy
Source
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,104 data points, 1988–2020
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.