Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Singapore: Citizen support for democracy
Citizen support for democracy over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 0.127 against 0.121 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.006.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Singapore ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 54th and Singapore ranks 52nd of 144 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Singapore in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.0562 | 0.432 | 0.4882 | Singapore |
| 2010s | -0.0045 | -0.1348 | 0.1303 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | 0.121 | 0.127 | 0.006 | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 0.127 against 0.121 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2020.
- What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Singapore?
- 0.006, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Singapore?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2020.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Singapore rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 54th and Singapore ranks 52nd of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Claassen (2022) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.