Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Malawi: Citizen support for democracy
Citizen support for democracy over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 0.128 against 0.121 in Bosnia and Herzegovina, a difference of 0.007.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Bosnia and Herzegovina's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 22 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 54th and Malawi ranks 51st of 144 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.2135 | 0.1167 | 0.0969 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2000s | -0.0092 | -0.3403 | 0.3311 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | -0.0045 | 0.1713 | 0.1757 | Malawi |
| 2020s | 0.121 | 0.128 | 0.007 | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 0.128 against 0.121 in Bosnia and Herzegovina as of 2020.
- What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Malawi?
- 0.007, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Malawi?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2020.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Malawi rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 54th and Malawi ranks 51st of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Claassen (2022) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.