Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Cambodia: Citizen support for democracy
Citizen support for democracy over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Cambodia
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 0.121 against 0.0875 in Cambodia, a difference of 0.0335.
That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.4 times Cambodia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 17 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Cambodia ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 54th and Cambodia ranks 56th of 144 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Cambodia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Cambodia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.1063 | 0.1231 | 0.2293 | Cambodia |
| 2010s | -0.0045 | 0.0298 | 0.0343 | Cambodia |
| 2020s | 0.121 | 0.0875 | 0.0335 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Cambodia?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 0.121 against 0.0875 in Cambodia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cambodia?
- 0.0335, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cambodia?
- 17 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2020.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cambodia rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 54th and Cambodia ranks 56th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Claassen (2022) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.