Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Cape Verde: Citizen support for democracy
Citizen support for democracy over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Cape Verde
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 0.121 against 0.0888 in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.0322.
That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.4 times Cape Verde's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 54th and Cape Verde ranks 55th of 144 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and Cape Verde in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Cape Verde | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -0.0562 | -0.2293 | 0.173 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2010s | -0.0045 | 0.2684 | 0.2729 | Cape Verde |
| 2020s | 0.121 | 0.0888 | 0.0322 | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Cape Verde?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 0.121 against 0.0888 in Cape Verde as of 2020.
- What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cape Verde?
- 0.0322, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cape Verde?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2020.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Cape Verde rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 54th and Cape Verde ranks 55th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Claassen (2022) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.