Benin vs Czechia: Citizen support for democracy

Benin
0.3831
in 2020
Czechia
0.3381
in 2020
Benin rank
36th
Czechia rank
37th

Citizen support for democracy over time

  • Benin
  • Czechia
-0.2500.250.50.751199020052020

How they compare

Benin currently reports 0.3831 against 0.3381 in Czechia, a difference of 0.045.

That makes Benin's figure about 1.1 times Czechia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Czechia ahead.

Benin ranks 36th and Czechia ranks 37th of 144 countries.

Benin has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Benin Czechia Difference Ahead
2000s 0.142 -0.0172 0.1592 Benin
2010s 0.5175 0.1451 0.3724 Benin
2020s 0.3831 0.3381 0.045 Benin

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Benin or Czechia?
Benin, at 0.3831 against 0.3381 in Czechia as of 2020.
What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Benin and Czechia?
0.045, with Benin ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Benin and Czechia?
16 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2020.
How do Benin and Czechia rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
Benin ranks 36th and Czechia ranks 37th of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Citizen support for democracy
Source
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,104 data points, 1988–2020
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.