Belize vs Lebanon: Citizen support for democracy

Belize
-0.1569
in 2020
Lebanon
-0.1699
in 2020
Belize rank
66th
Lebanon rank
67th

Citizen support for democracy over time

  • Belize
  • Lebanon
-0.4-0.200.20.4200220112020

How they compare

Belize currently reports -0.1569 against -0.1699 in Lebanon, a difference of 0.013.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Lebanon ahead.

Belize ranks 66th and Lebanon ranks 67th of 144 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belize averaged higher in 1 and Lebanon in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belize Lebanon Difference Ahead
2000s -0.2633 0.205 0.4683 Lebanon
2010s -0.0043 0.0335 0.0377 Lebanon
2020s -0.1569 -0.1699 0.013 Belize

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Belize or Lebanon?
Belize, at -0.1569 against -0.1699 in Lebanon as of 2020.
What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Belize and Lebanon?
0.013, with Belize ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belize and Lebanon?
13 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2020.
How do Belize and Lebanon rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
Belize ranks 66th and Lebanon ranks 67th of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Citizen support for democracy
Source
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,104 data points, 1988–2020
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.