Belgium vs Israel: Citizen support for democracy

Belgium
0.6238
in 2020
Israel
0.7144
in 2020
Belgium rank
28th
Israel rank
25th

Citizen support for democracy over time

  • Belgium
  • Israel
00.20.40.60.8198820042020

How they compare

Israel currently reports 0.7144 against 0.6238 in Belgium, a difference of 0.0906.

That makes Israel's figure about 1.1 times Belgium's.

Across all 18 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.

Belgium ranks 28th and Israel ranks 25th of 144 countries.

Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Israel Difference Ahead
2000s 0.6358 0.7226 0.0867 Israel
2010s 0.629 0.7187 0.0897 Israel
2020s 0.6238 0.7144 0.0906 Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Belgium or Israel?
Israel, at 0.7144 against 0.6238 in Belgium as of 2020.
What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Belgium and Israel?
0.0906, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Israel?
18 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2020.
How do Belgium and Israel rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
Belgium ranks 28th and Israel ranks 25th of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Citizen support for democracy
Source
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,104 data points, 1988–2020
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.