Armenia vs Latvia: Citizen support for democracy

Armenia
-0.4036
in 2020
Latvia
-0.4722
in 2020
Armenia rank
78th
Latvia rank
79th

Citizen support for democracy over time

  • Armenia
  • Latvia
-1-0.8-0.6-0.4-0.2199520072020

How they compare

Armenia currently reports -0.4036 against -0.4722 in Latvia, a difference of 0.0686.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 24 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Latvia ahead.

Armenia ranks 78th and Latvia ranks 79th of 144 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Armenia averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s -0.5021 -0.2815 0.2206 Latvia
2000s -0.6727 -0.3132 0.3595 Latvia
2010s -0.6486 -0.4845 0.1642 Latvia
2020s -0.4036 -0.4722 0.0686 Armenia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Armenia or Latvia?
Armenia, at -0.4036 against -0.4722 in Latvia as of 2020.
What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Armenia and Latvia?
0.0686, with Armenia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Latvia?
24 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2020.
How do Armenia and Latvia rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
Armenia ranks 78th and Latvia ranks 79th of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Citizen support for democracy
Source
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,104 data points, 1988–2020
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.