Armenia vs Ireland: Citizen support for democracy

Armenia
-0.4036
in 2020
Ireland
-0.399
in 2020
Armenia rank
78th
Ireland rank
77th

Citizen support for democracy over time

  • Armenia
  • Ireland
-1-0.500.5198820042020

How they compare

Ireland currently reports -0.399 against -0.4036 in Armenia, a difference of 0.0046.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Ireland has been ahead every year.

Armenia ranks 78th and Ireland ranks 77th of 144 countries.

Ireland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Armenia Ireland Difference Ahead
1990s -0.5021 0.517 1.02 Ireland
2000s -0.6727 -0.1236 0.5491 Ireland
2010s -0.6486 -0.4048 0.2439 Ireland
2020s -0.4036 -0.399 0.0046 Ireland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Armenia or Ireland?
Ireland, at -0.399 against -0.4036 in Armenia as of 2020.
What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Armenia and Ireland?
0.0046, with Ireland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Armenia and Ireland?
24 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2020.
How do Armenia and Ireland rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
Armenia ranks 78th and Ireland ranks 77th of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Citizen support for democracy
Source
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,104 data points, 1988–2020
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.