Argentina vs Tunisia: Citizen support for democracy

Argentina
-0.5533
in 2020
Tunisia
-0.5571
in 2020
Argentina rank
87th
Tunisia rank
88th

Citizen support for democracy over time

  • Argentina
  • Tunisia
-1-0.500.5199520072020

How they compare

Argentina currently reports -0.5533 against -0.5571 in Tunisia, a difference of 0.0038.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Argentina has been ahead every year.

Argentina ranks 87th and Tunisia ranks 88th of 144 countries.

Argentina has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Argentina Tunisia Difference Ahead
2010s 0.1059 -0.7287 0.8346 Argentina
2020s -0.5533 -0.5571 0.0038 Argentina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Argentina or Tunisia?
Argentina, at -0.5533 against -0.5571 in Tunisia as of 2020.
What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Argentina and Tunisia?
0.0038, with Argentina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Tunisia?
10 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2020.
How do Argentina and Tunisia rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
Argentina ranks 87th and Tunisia ranks 88th of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Citizen support for democracy
Source
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,104 data points, 1988–2020
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.