Argentina vs Dominican Republic: Citizen support for democracy
Citizen support for democracy over time
- Argentina
- Dominican Republic
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports -0.5441 against -0.5533 in Argentina, a difference of 0.0092.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Argentina ahead.
Argentina ranks 87th and Dominican Republic ranks 85th of 144 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Argentina averaged higher in 3 and Dominican Republic in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Argentina | Dominican Republic | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4467 | 0.2252 | 0.2214 | Argentina |
| 2000s | 0.0797 | 0.017 | 0.0627 | Argentina |
| 2010s | 0.1108 | -0.1088 | 0.2195 | Argentina |
| 2020s | -0.5533 | -0.5441 | 0.0092 | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Argentina or Dominican Republic?
- Dominican Republic, at -0.5441 against -0.5533 in Argentina as of 2020.
- What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Argentina and Dominican Republic?
- 0.0092, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Argentina and Dominican Republic?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2020.
- How do Argentina and Dominican Republic rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
- Argentina ranks 87th and Dominican Republic ranks 85th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Claassen (2022) β processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.