Andorra vs Switzerland: Citizen support for democracy

Andorra
1.92
in 2020
Switzerland
1.94
in 2020
Andorra rank
7th
Switzerland rank
5th

Citizen support for democracy over time

  • Andorra
  • Switzerland
0.511.52199620082020

How they compare

Switzerland currently reports 1.94 against 1.92 in Andorra, a difference of 0.02.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Andorra ahead.

Andorra ranks 7th and Switzerland ranks 5th of 144 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Andorra averaged higher in 2 and Switzerland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Andorra Switzerland Difference Ahead
2000s 2.17 1.75 0.4212 Andorra
2010s 2 1.88 0.1181 Andorra
2020s 1.92 1.94 0.0186 Switzerland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Andorra or Switzerland?
Switzerland, at 1.94 against 1.92 in Andorra as of 2020.
What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Andorra and Switzerland?
0.02, with Switzerland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Andorra and Switzerland?
16 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2020.
How do Andorra and Switzerland rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
Andorra ranks 7th and Switzerland ranks 5th of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Citizen support for democracy
Source
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,104 data points, 1988–2020
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.