Andorra vs Sweden: Citizen support for democracy

Andorra
1.92
in 2020
Sweden
2.13
in 2020
Andorra rank
7th
Sweden rank
4th

Citizen support for democracy over time

  • Andorra
  • Sweden
00.511.52199620082020

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 2.13 against 1.92 in Andorra, a difference of 0.21.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Andorra's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Andorra ahead.

Andorra ranks 7th and Sweden ranks 4th of 144 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Andorra averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Andorra Sweden Difference Ahead
2000s 2.17 1.53 0.6466 Andorra
2010s 2 1.75 0.2464 Andorra
2020s 1.92 2.13 0.2072 Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Andorra or Sweden?
Sweden, at 2.13 against 1.92 in Andorra as of 2020.
What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Andorra and Sweden?
0.21, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Andorra and Sweden?
16 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2020.
How do Andorra and Sweden rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
Andorra ranks 7th and Sweden ranks 4th of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Citizen support for democracy
Source
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,104 data points, 1988–2020
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.