Algeria vs Mexico: Citizen support for democracy

Algeria
-1
in 2020
Mexico
-0.9881
in 2020
Algeria rank
116th
Mexico rank
115th

Citizen support for democracy over time

  • Algeria
  • Mexico
-1.5-1.2-1-0.75-0.5-0.25199520072020

How they compare

Mexico currently reports -0.9881 against -1 in Algeria, a difference of 0.0119.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2002 it was Mexico ahead.

Algeria ranks 116th and Mexico ranks 115th of 144 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Algeria Mexico Difference Ahead
2000s -1.18 -0.4914 0.6912 Mexico
2010s -1.03 -0.8738 0.1535 Mexico
2020s -1 -0.9881 0.0153 Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Algeria or Mexico?
Mexico, at -0.9881 against -1 in Algeria as of 2020.
What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Algeria and Mexico?
0.0119, with Mexico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Algeria and Mexico?
19 years are reported by both, from 2002 to 2020.
How do Algeria and Mexico rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
Algeria ranks 116th and Mexico ranks 115th of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Citizen support for democracy
Source
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,104 data points, 1988–2020
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.