Albania vs Sweden: Citizen support for democracy

Albania
1.94
in 2020
Sweden
2.13
in 2020
Albania rank
6th
Sweden rank
4th

Citizen support for democracy over time

  • Albania
  • Sweden
0.511.52199620082020

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 2.13 against 1.94 in Albania, a difference of 0.19.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.1 times Albania's.

Across all 23 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.

Albania ranks 6th and Sweden ranks 4th of 144 countries.

Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Albania Sweden Difference Ahead
1990s 0.9372 1.65 0.7173 Sweden
2000s 0.6783 1.62 0.9439 Sweden
2010s 1.35 1.75 0.4027 Sweden
2020s 1.94 2.13 0.1903 Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Albania or Sweden?
Sweden, at 2.13 against 1.94 in Albania as of 2020.
What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Albania and Sweden?
0.19, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Sweden?
23 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2020.
How do Albania and Sweden rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
Albania ranks 6th and Sweden ranks 4th of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Citizen support for democracy
Source
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,104 data points, 1988–2020
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.