Albania vs Denmark: Citizen support for democracy

Albania
1.94
in 2020
Denmark
2.35
in 2020
Albania rank
6th
Denmark rank
3rd

Citizen support for democracy over time

  • Albania
  • Denmark
0.511.522.5198820042020

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 2.35 against 1.94 in Albania, a difference of 0.41.

That makes Denmark's figure about 1.2 times Albania's.

Across all 23 years both countries report, Denmark has been ahead every year.

Albania ranks 6th and Denmark ranks 3rd of 144 countries.

Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Albania Denmark Difference Ahead
1990s 0.9372 2.4 1.46 Denmark
2000s 0.6783 2.56 1.88 Denmark
2010s 1.35 2.44 1.09 Denmark
2020s 1.94 2.35 0.4062 Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher citizen support for democracy, Albania or Denmark?
Denmark, at 2.35 against 1.94 in Albania as of 2020.
What is the difference in citizen support for democracy between Albania and Denmark?
0.41, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Albania and Denmark?
23 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2020.
How do Albania and Denmark rank globally for citizen support for democracy?
Albania ranks 6th and Denmark ranks 3rd of 144 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Citizen support for democracy. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Citizen support for democracy
Source
Claassen (2022) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
144 places, 3,104 data points, 1988–2020
Last refreshed

Central estimate of the average extent to which citizens support a democratic political system and reject autocratic alternatives. It combines responses across more than one thousand nationally-representative surveys on how desirable citizens find democracy, how they evaluate undemocratic alternatives (such as a strong unelected leader, the army, or religious authorities), and how they assess democratic and autocratic political systems relative to another.