Moldova vs Thailand: Asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin
Asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin over time
- Moldova
- Thailand
How they compare
Moldova currently reports 3,021 against 2,656 in Thailand, a difference of 365.
That makes Moldova's figure about 1.1 times Thailand's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Moldova has been ahead every year.
Moldova ranks 89th and Thailand ranks 92nd of 198 countries.
Moldova has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Moldova | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 1,049 | 236.6 | 812.7 | Moldova |
| 2010s | 2,524 | 1,059 | 1,465 | Moldova |
| 2020s | 5,785 | 3,374 | 2,411 | Moldova |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin, Moldova or Thailand?
- Moldova, at 3,021 against 2,656 in Thailand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin between Moldova and Thailand?
- 365, with Moldova ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Moldova and Thailand?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Moldova and Thailand rank globally for asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin?
- Moldova ranks 89th and Thailand ranks 92nd of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Refugee Population Statistics Database, UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), published as Asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Asylum-seekers are individuals who have sought international protection and whose claims for refugee status have not yet been determined. This includes those who are in various stages of the asylum process, such as initial application, appeal, or awaiting final decision. In specific contexts, asylum-seekers may also include those who are seeking protection under complementary forms of protection, and those enjoying temporary protection, but whose claims are still under consideration.