Libya vs Malaysia: Asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin
Asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin over time
- Libya
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 5,510 against 3,802 in Libya, a difference of 1,708.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.4 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Libya ahead.
Libya ranks 83rd and Malaysia ranks 80th of 198 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Malaysia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 706.8 | 223.9 | 482.9 | Libya |
| 2010s | 4,254 | 5,640 | 1,386 | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 5,574 | 16,532 | 10,958 | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin, Libya or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 5,510 against 3,802 in Libya as of 2025.
- What is the difference in asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin between Libya and Malaysia?
- 1,708, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Malaysia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Libya and Malaysia rank globally for asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin?
- Libya ranks 83rd and Malaysia ranks 80th of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Refugee Population Statistics Database, UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), published as Asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Asylum-seekers are individuals who have sought international protection and whose claims for refugee status have not yet been determined. This includes those who are in various stages of the asylum process, such as initial application, appeal, or awaiting final decision. In specific contexts, asylum-seekers may also include those who are seeking protection under complementary forms of protection, and those enjoying temporary protection, but whose claims are still under consideration.