Czechia vs Montenegro: Asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin
Asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin over time
- Czechia
- Montenegro
How they compare
Montenegro currently reports 165 against 161 in Czechia, a difference of 4.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 149th and Montenegro ranks 148th of 198 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 799.25 | 192.75 | 606.5 | Czechia |
| 2010s | 327.4 | 885.8 | 558.4 | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 175.17 | 779.83 | 604.67 | Montenegro |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin, Czechia or Montenegro?
- Montenegro, at 165 against 161 in Czechia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin between Czechia and Montenegro?
- 4, with Montenegro ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Montenegro?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2025.
- How do Czechia and Montenegro rank globally for asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin?
- Czechia ranks 149th and Montenegro ranks 148th of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Refugee Population Statistics Database, UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), published as Asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Asylum-seekers are individuals who have sought international protection and whose claims for refugee status have not yet been determined. This includes those who are in various stages of the asylum process, such as initial application, appeal, or awaiting final decision. In specific contexts, asylum-seekers may also include those who are seeking protection under complementary forms of protection, and those enjoying temporary protection, but whose claims are still under consideration.