Congo vs Tunisia: Asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin
Asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin over time
- Congo
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 10,338 against 9,431 in Congo, a difference of 907.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Congo ahead.
Congo ranks 62nd and Tunisia ranks 61st of 198 countries.
Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 5,686 | 379.6 | 5,306 | Congo |
| 2010s | 5,859 | 2,012 | 3,847 | Congo |
| 2020s | 11,214 | 7,618 | 3,595 | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin, Congo or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 10,338 against 9,431 in Congo as of 2025.
- What is the difference in asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin between Congo and Tunisia?
- 907, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Tunisia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Congo and Tunisia rank globally for asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin?
- Congo ranks 62nd and Tunisia ranks 61st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Refugee Population Statistics Database, UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), published as Asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Asylum-seekers are individuals who have sought international protection and whose claims for refugee status have not yet been determined. This includes those who are in various stages of the asylum process, such as initial application, appeal, or awaiting final decision. In specific contexts, asylum-seekers may also include those who are seeking protection under complementary forms of protection, and those enjoying temporary protection, but whose claims are still under consideration.