Cape Verde vs Grenada: Asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin
Asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin over time
- Cape Verde
- Grenada
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 79 against 76 in Grenada, a difference of 3.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Grenada ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 159th and Grenada ranks 162nd of 198 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 2 and Grenada in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Grenada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 9.4 | 137.5 | 128.1 | Grenada |
| 2010s | 90.8 | 57.4 | 33.4 | Cape Verde |
| 2020s | 230.83 | 104.83 | 126 | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin, Cape Verde or Grenada?
- Cape Verde, at 79 against 76 in Grenada as of 2025.
- What is the difference in asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin between Cape Verde and Grenada?
- 3, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Grenada?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Cape Verde and Grenada rank globally for asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin?
- Cape Verde ranks 159th and Grenada ranks 162nd of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Refugee Population Statistics Database, UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), published as Asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Asylum-seekers are individuals who have sought international protection and whose claims for refugee status have not yet been determined. This includes those who are in various stages of the asylum process, such as initial application, appeal, or awaiting final decision. In specific contexts, asylum-seekers may also include those who are seeking protection under complementary forms of protection, and those enjoying temporary protection, but whose claims are still under consideration.