Angola vs Viet Nam: Asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin
Asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin over time
- Angola
- Viet Nam
How they compare
Viet Nam currently reports 19,253 against 16,983 in Angola, a difference of 2,270.
That makes Viet Nam's figure about 1.1 times Angola's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 54th and Viet Nam ranks 51st of 198 countries.
Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Viet Nam | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 6,299 | 1,754 | 4,545 | Angola |
| 2010s | 4,131 | 3,864 | 267 | Angola |
| 2020s | 17,144 | 14,240 | 2,904 | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin, Angola or Viet Nam?
- Viet Nam, at 19,253 against 16,983 in Angola as of 2025.
- What is the difference in asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin between Angola and Viet Nam?
- 2,270, with Viet Nam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Viet Nam?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Angola and Viet Nam rank globally for asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin?
- Angola ranks 54th and Viet Nam ranks 51st of 198 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Refugee Population Statistics Database, UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), published as Asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Asylum-seekers are individuals who have sought international protection and whose claims for refugee status have not yet been determined. This includes those who are in various stages of the asylum process, such as initial application, appeal, or awaiting final decision. In specific contexts, asylum-seekers may also include those who are seeking protection under complementary forms of protection, and those enjoying temporary protection, but whose claims are still under consideration.