Hong Kong, China vs Rwanda: Asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin, per square kilometre

Hong Kong, China
0.6505 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
0.7417 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Hong Kong, China rank
18th
Rwanda rank
15th

Asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin, per square kilometre over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Rwanda
00.250.50.751200020112023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 0.7417 units per square kilometre against 0.6505 units per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.0912 units per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Hong Kong, China's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Rwanda ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 18th and Rwanda ranks 15th of 197 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Rwanda Difference Ahead
2000s 0.0239 units per square kilometre 0.4898 units per square kilometre 0.4659 units per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 0.0743 units per square kilometre 0.4591 units per square kilometre 0.3848 units per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 0.7074 units per square kilometre 0.7738 units per square kilometre 0.0664 units per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin, per square kilometre, Hong Kong, China or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 0.7417 units per square kilometre against 0.6505 units per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China as of 2023.
What is the difference in asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin, per square kilometre between Hong Kong, China and Rwanda?
0.0912 units per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Rwanda?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Hong Kong, China and Rwanda rank globally for asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin, per square kilometre?
Hong Kong, China ranks 18th and Rwanda ranks 15th of 197 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Rwanda: Asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://social-development.statizoid.com/compare/asylum-seekers-by-country-or-territory-of-origin-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://social-development.statizoid.com/compare/asylum-seekers-by-country-or-territory-of-origin-per-square-kilometre/hong-kong-sar-china/rwanda/">Hong Kong, China vs Rwanda: Asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
244 places, 5,589 data points, 2000–2023
Last refreshed

Asylum-seekers by country or territory of origin divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.