Lithuania vs Serbia: Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum
Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum over time
- Lithuania
- Serbia
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 156 against 134 in Serbia, a difference of 22.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.2 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 132nd and Serbia ranks 135th of 179 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 74.2 | 25.3 | 48.9 | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 157.5 | 258.4 | 100.9 | Serbia |
| 2020s | 253.67 | 202.5 | 51.17 | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum, Lithuania or Serbia?
- Lithuania, at 156 against 134 in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum between Lithuania and Serbia?
- 22, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Serbia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Lithuania and Serbia rank globally for asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum?
- Lithuania ranks 132nd and Serbia ranks 135th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Refugee Population Statistics Database, UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), published as Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Asylum-seekers are individuals who have sought international protection and whose claims for refugee status have not yet been determined. This includes those who are in various stages of the asylum process, such as initial application, appeal, or awaiting final decision. In specific contexts, asylum-seekers may also include those who are seeking protection under complementary forms of protection, and those enjoying temporary protection, but whose claims are still under consideration.