Lesotho vs Montenegro: Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum
Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum over time
- Lesotho
- Montenegro
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 202 against 175 in Montenegro, a difference of 27.
That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.2 times Montenegro's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Montenegro ahead.
Lesotho ranks 126th and Montenegro ranks 128th of 179 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 16.33 | 145.67 | 129.33 | Montenegro |
| 2020s | 241.5 | 165.17 | 76.33 | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum, Lesotho or Montenegro?
- Lesotho, at 202 against 175 in Montenegro as of 2025.
- What is the difference in asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum between Lesotho and Montenegro?
- 27, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Montenegro?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
- How do Lesotho and Montenegro rank globally for asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum?
- Lesotho ranks 126th and Montenegro ranks 128th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Refugee Population Statistics Database, UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), published as Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Asylum-seekers are individuals who have sought international protection and whose claims for refugee status have not yet been determined. This includes those who are in various stages of the asylum process, such as initial application, appeal, or awaiting final decision. In specific contexts, asylum-seekers may also include those who are seeking protection under complementary forms of protection, and those enjoying temporary protection, but whose claims are still under consideration.