Italy vs Kenya: Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum
Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum over time
- Italy
- Kenya
How they compare
Italy currently reports 234,144 against 218,646 in Kenya, a difference of 15,498.
That makes Italy's figure about 1.1 times Kenya's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Kenya ahead.
Italy ranks 7th and Kenya ranks 8th of 179 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Italy averaged higher in 2 and Kenya in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Kenya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 597.8 | 10,564 | 9,967 | Kenya |
| 2010s | 59,059 | 43,292 | 15,768 | Italy |
| 2020s | 129,000 | 128,527 | 473.33 | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum, Italy or Kenya?
- Italy, at 234,144 against 218,646 in Kenya as of 2025.
- What is the difference in asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum between Italy and Kenya?
- 15,498, with Italy ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Kenya?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Italy and Kenya rank globally for asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum?
- Italy ranks 7th and Kenya ranks 8th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Refugee Population Statistics Database, UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), published as Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Asylum-seekers are individuals who have sought international protection and whose claims for refugee status have not yet been determined. This includes those who are in various stages of the asylum process, such as initial application, appeal, or awaiting final decision. In specific contexts, asylum-seekers may also include those who are seeking protection under complementary forms of protection, and those enjoying temporary protection, but whose claims are still under consideration.