Eswatini vs Suriname: Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum
Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum over time
- Eswatini
- Suriname
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 3,511 against 3,191 in Suriname, a difference of 320.
That makes Eswatini's figure about 1.1 times Suriname's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 10 shared years of data; in 2016 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 78th and Suriname ranks 81st of 179 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 655.75 | 435.5 | 220.25 | Eswatini |
| 2020s | 1,862 | 2,614 | 751.83 | Suriname |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum, Eswatini or Suriname?
- Eswatini, at 3,511 against 3,191 in Suriname as of 2025.
- What is the difference in asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum between Eswatini and Suriname?
- 320, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Suriname?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2016 to 2025.
- How do Eswatini and Suriname rank globally for asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum?
- Eswatini ranks 78th and Suriname ranks 81st of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Refugee Population Statistics Database, UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), published as Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Asylum-seekers are individuals who have sought international protection and whose claims for refugee status have not yet been determined. This includes those who are in various stages of the asylum process, such as initial application, appeal, or awaiting final decision. In specific contexts, asylum-seekers may also include those who are seeking protection under complementary forms of protection, and those enjoying temporary protection, but whose claims are still under consideration.