Estonia vs Nepal: Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum
Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum over time
- Estonia
- Nepal
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 321 against 302 in Nepal, a difference of 19.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Nepal's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 120th and Nepal ranks 122nd of 179 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 1 and Nepal in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Nepal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 7.9 | 723.7 | 715.8 | Nepal |
| 2010s | 32.4 | 259.9 | 227.5 | Nepal |
| 2020s | 248.33 | 201.83 | 46.5 | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum, Estonia or Nepal?
- Estonia, at 321 against 302 in Nepal as of 2025.
- What is the difference in asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum between Estonia and Nepal?
- 19, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Nepal?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Estonia and Nepal rank globally for asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum?
- Estonia ranks 120th and Nepal ranks 122nd of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Refugee Population Statistics Database, UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), published as Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Asylum-seekers are individuals who have sought international protection and whose claims for refugee status have not yet been determined. This includes those who are in various stages of the asylum process, such as initial application, appeal, or awaiting final decision. In specific contexts, asylum-seekers may also include those who are seeking protection under complementary forms of protection, and those enjoying temporary protection, but whose claims are still under consideration.