Czechia vs Madagascar: Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum
Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum over time
- Czechia
- Madagascar
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 1,279 against 993 in Czechia, a difference of 286.
That makes Madagascar's figure about 1.3 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Czechia ahead.
Czechia ranks 101st and Madagascar ranks 98th of 179 countries.
Czechia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 887.78 | 35.22 | 852.56 | Czechia |
| 2020s | 1,149 | 635.83 | 513 | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum, Czechia or Madagascar?
- Madagascar, at 1,279 against 993 in Czechia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum between Czechia and Madagascar?
- 286, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Madagascar?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
- How do Czechia and Madagascar rank globally for asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum?
- Czechia ranks 101st and Madagascar ranks 98th of 179 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Refugee Population Statistics Database, UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), published as Asylum-seekers by country or territory of asylum. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Asylum-seekers are individuals who have sought international protection and whose claims for refugee status have not yet been determined. This includes those who are in various stages of the asylum process, such as initial application, appeal, or awaiting final decision. In specific contexts, asylum-seekers may also include those who are seeking protection under complementary forms of protection, and those enjoying temporary protection, but whose claims are still under consideration.